Both songs share the same(p) sentiments about contend – that it causes much pain, misery, devastation, suffering and death. However, the way in which they bring across their views are quite different. Scott’s poem gives us an idea of the changing attitudes people have towards war before and after it takes place - people go to war with full(prenominal) hopes but return dead. On the other hand, Owen’s poem is in a sonnet form and offers an hymn or a song of praise, rather, for a whole coevals of young men doomed to die in combat while simultaneously mocking them about it.
Firstly, both poems cope with that war is the cause of much misery and pain and that at the end of the day, no one can bring spikelet the dead. As Scott put it, the aftermath of war includes “burning towns”, “ done for(p) swains”, “mangled limbs”, “dying groans” and “orphan moans”. Owen also mocks them by petition “What passing bells for those who die as cattle?” Owen uses the image of “cattle” in a slaughterhouse to depict how these young soldiers who had high hopes about war died. The use of vivid imagery such(prenominal) as the ones mentioned above is a strong and common calculate both poems share.
However, although both poems agree that war is devastating, they both focus on different issues. Scott’s poem is more oecumenical while Owen’s focuses more on the individuals themselves, saying that at the end of the day no one is really dismission to remember and sincerely pray for those who sacrificed their lives during the war.
Scott is able to highlight the crinkle of emotions before and after the war takes place. He realises that before war, younker have no clue what they are putting themselves into – “To uncaring youth it pleasure yields”. He also notices that they tend to be very patriotic before the war so much so that when “Ambition’s voice...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment