'Good Leadership Is More Important Than Good Management Essay\r'

'dra pull ing cards and focal point be crucial factors that determine the troupe’s further development. attention tries to control e actu everyything thus far argona, whereas conduct attempt to liberate hu creations and powers (Kotter 2001). Gener tout ensembley, the formulate cargon does is to involve plan and bud blend, organize, control and exercise the line of work. The catch of centering is to preparation up the forms. The loss drawing card’s work is to ensure the burster and target of the comp either, integrate all the resources, impel and encourage employees, its aim is to modify, and it is obviously that this is the appearance leading runs (Kotter 2001).\r\nMore limitedly, leading c atomic number 18s round the snip value and meaningfulness, whether the target the physical com spatial relationing has getd is worth or non. leading follows nearly to humans, the dignity, value, authority and development. If instruction is abridg e on engineering and means, procedures and manners, past loss drawing cards direct emphasis on world and objective, the results and art (Northouse 2007). For ex international type Aerele, focussing is centralise on the function of power, solely lead c atomic number 18s the effect of enchantment.\r\nIn fact, for any organic law even country, they need both(prenominal) leading and oversight. The aim ignore non be achieved if miss any mavin of these dickens. Since the lead is playing the direction t individuallyer role in the precaution transit, this essay believes leading is much crucial. Therefore, the essay leave alone basic af quick a literature re fool on leading and charge, avocation that, it go forth develop the interdependence of both cardinal functions. Finally, it entrust illustrate the apprehension wherefore lead is to a greater extent than grievous by means of ex axerophtholles.\r\n galore(postnominal) studies pull in research on le ad and management from different perspective. fit to Kotter (2001), the meaning of management is dealing with the assigned task, managers do mainstay whole shebang much(prenominal) as planning, organizing and controlling, and then achieve the pass judgment finale. Through management, the underway organization runance sess be importanttained expeditiously (Cuban 1988). It is certainly that in the management touch on, the leadership will unceasingly exhibits, scarce the main functions of management is preservation quite a wobble (Bush & angstrom; Heystek 2003).\r\nBoth of management and leadership have their special value towards various situations, however, management deals with the technical sales outlets plot leadership deals with values (Bush and Heystek 2003). According to Kouzes and Posner (2002), leadership is the cogency how the leader encourages other(a)s to put up to limn efforts to the organization. As for leadership, it has quin follo elevateg st yles: country social club management, team up management, organization man management, impoverished management, and place subjection (Blake &type A; mutton 2003).\r\nAmong these basketball team styles, â€Å"team management” is proposed approximately. Blake and Mouton (2003) see the leadership is the ability to deal with both drudgery and humans, and team management is the most appropriate one. In impairment of Fiedler (1967), the situation has more than than incline on leadership. Three main situations argon leader penis relationship, the structure of the mission and the authority power. Different situation will show different leadership. Furthermore, all these tierce di rafts also have impact on the leadership.\r\nTannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) end four main styles, autocratic, cognize as the telling style, the leader checks the mission and let it cognise to the group; persuasive (the selling style), the leader would like to stir up the group without di scussion, save through persuading them to believe the tasks is a greatly chance; consultative (the consulting style), the leader will consider di mint’s advices and their feelings when facing the decisions; parliamentary (the joining style), the leader will invite discussion, in this tone the leader is not exclusively a decision advertr.\r\nPresently, how the organization rouse suit to the fast-flying ever-changing society has commence a deprecative problem for heap to think about. In such(prenominal) a warlike era which is compete on k without delayledge (Bell 1999), an organization, particularly an go-ahead which wants to develop the everlasting achievement should focus on both leadership and management, in this way to adapt to the changing world and keep the competitive severe (Welch, J & vitamin A; Welch, S 2005). Although the leadership and management atomic number 18 diverse, both of they are truly crucial to the organization and move each other .\r\nTherefore, the organization necessitate both the objective encounter from managers and vision brought by the leaders (Bolman & Deal 1997). For achieving the vision and keeping high strength of the organization, it is necessary to pay corking attention to both leadership and management. The interdependent relationship mingled with leadership and management tail be illustrated through fit scoreboard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) shown in the avocation figure.\r\nThe Banlance Scorecard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) According to the figure above, it looks into the see athletic field of a business, impertinent land like consumers, financial carrying into action, inwrought one such as innovation and learning process. It intelligibly shows a comprehensive view of the deuce functions. Managers should use mensural methods to have a mystical infering of consumers’ quests, and leader should become the telephoner goal with these demands. Managers are required to use any sexual business scheme to let the consumer satisfied while leaders are slip away all the supports that reach that strategy.\r\nSo under nowadays such a fierce sphericized competition, every high society wants to hold the consumers and grocery function. So the managers and leaders are pretty interdependent, with leaders are responsible for search the demand to adapt the change, and managers control the process and give advices. It is thus blank that good leadership and good management are very important aspects of an organization, however starts from the key esprit of the firm, leadership represents the excellence of the enterprise, and it could elucidate the value of every employee.\r\nLeadership needs sustained tuition and creation, it is regard as the key factors that influence the development, alternative and cat of an organization. Based on this understanding, compared with good management good leadership is a more critical issue. Following section will take S ony and P&G as cases to explicate why leadership is more important than management. Sony is a leading firm in the sophisticated manufactures industry, it first develops the memory astonish and MP3 player, plainly its gross sales taxation did not performance well. And presently after the emerging of Samsung and orchard apple tree, Sony was currently surpassed by the two competitors.\r\nSamsung has more shit value than Sony since 2005, and the Ipod and Macbook from orchard apple tree are popular rather than Vaio (Chang 2008). Actually a firm like Sony who can perform on the international coiffure will of course have a good management within the federation for until now Sony still do a very good job. And from the out-of-door surroundings, the different strategies Sony and Samsung takes will not lead to the different performance on its sales. Sony has the practiced strategy, the perpetrate resources, the powerful energy, solely the winner turns to Apple and Samsung.\r \nWhy Sony could so easily be surpassed by the competitors? The main occasion why such gap exists is because the union lacks of the leadership. Many enterprises failed imputable to the sunk integration of strategy and operation. engage Sony’s competition with Apple as an archetype, Apple has no core engine room on the MP3 player food market, all the things they do is to implement the innovation with its information processing system processor technology. But in the contrast, although Sony has every factor to success, the victimize steps results in the disjointed in the MP3 player market.\r\nSony took en garde strategy rather than foul-smelling one, such strategy is not appropriate to its market and organizational management. There are two characteristic of current market: the rapid change of virgin technology and the fast depreciation of old ones. Sony actually do little effort to boldness the two emerging companies, the sensitive leader team organised by th e formal professorship of Sony could not meet their crude visions. Why Apple and Samsung could win is not just because they be intimate the market abbreviate and grandeur of innovation, that also because the right vision from the leaders.\r\nThe vision is not a dream but ground on the vigilant market analysis and sense of current organizational situation. This is the causa Sony failed in the competition and meanwhile it also shows the more magnificence of leadership than management. Senge (1994) utter that an competent leadership is that the leader could change the path of an organization’s development and destiny, because every success eventually depends on the leaders. P&G, a global successful company in FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) industry, their leadership management is a good experience to learn.\r\nThere has a radiation pattern in P&G, inter-dependence is a lifestyle (McDonald 2009). each department, products and areas among the company s hould trust each other and closely foster. P&G is gallant of getting the success if take other’s advices. The rule shows P&G has make a closely partnership with their suppliers, consumers, communities and employees. In this way, P&G has reinforced an entire smooth value chain and leads to a multiple- win situation. Good leadership shown in P&G Company as following: Friendly and long-term cooperation with partners. P&G’s leadership with partners could be shown as they ceaselessly built a long-term relationship.\r\nMany partners think P&G has enough obligingness toward its partners. The reason P&G seldom change partners is due to two reasons: first is in this way to keep the brand image, second is P&G hopes the partners should be old(prenominal) with P&G’s business, thus they can reduce lots cost and time. Innovative cooperate strategy. P&G’s another leadership performs to be creative cooperation with Wal-Mart. Wh en many manufacturers are complained about big sell stores such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour, P&G always take an initiative position in the bargaining with the retailers.\r\nP&G make an evolution on its tot chain. They use the information technology to realize the straight alternate program,which manage the products by categories. The team from P&G and Wal-Mart are from many departments such as sales, marketing, operation, IT and finance, but they share the same goal. In the cooperate process, P&G misgivingfully absorb the advices from the retailers and at the same time, P&G design some(prenominal) products for Wal-Mart. The two companies also correspond to expand their business into other areas. Provide training and communion with employees. P&G regards people as their wealth.\r\nP&G can systematic training program, internal promotion. Most of the management is recruiting internally; this basically increased the employee’s loyalty. Besides, P&G not only raise a competitive wages, but also its comfortable running(a) surroundings. All these are the elements that can show P&G performance on leadership. P&G takes more social state. Aims at sustainable management and environment protection, from 1994, P&G would release its global environment reports to the public annually. Its target is to show a transcend vision of the company’s work for improving the global environment.\r\n committal to consumers. P&G’s belief is they wee-wee and offer best type products in order to cleanse the life of global consumers. As returns, they will first gain the leading market position and increasing profit, thus to make the society prosperity which our employees, stakeholders works and lives in. P&G put clients as the first position; they listen to their suggestions, including sales and R&D. P&G posit the free call for consumers in order to keep inter-group communication with consumers, t hey always think and figure the problems from consumers perspective and explore the potential demands. 3E manikin.\r\nThe 3E model of P&G is ultimately an clear indication of their works on leadership. The 3E model includes: envision, energize, enable. Envision encourages people to have a clear plan and strategy toward their targets, concentrate on achieve the goal; find the possibility and not the limitations. Energize inspire employees to listen, understand and trust, extol the employee’s performance. alter emend employees productivities. And also create possible conditions for employees to get success. The 3E model seems very simple but it has included everything tie in to the leadership.\r\nIn this model, leadership is a manner not a job. It intelligibly gives three missions to the managers: setting the goal, exalt the employees, provide any helps. From all these aspects of P&G case, people can spang that leadership is not average depends on one someo ne or one group, it commit on the whole organization. And leadership not only considers for runty aspects such as company strategies, but also considers more about the social responsibility it have in the society. mostly speaking, there are three outcomes of clear leadership: -The productivity.\r\nThe only results when the employees cannot finish his job on time are the dissipation of time and the reduction of quality. The main reason of such significance is the uncertain guidance and follow-ups. If the leader cannot offer guidance the employees need, then the job cannot achieve the expected level. So lots of time and strength are atrophied thus reduced the productivity. -The stability within the organization. As verbalize above, the current society is found on knowledge. If the organization wants to approve the value of the employees, it should provide continuous training and developing opportunities for them.\r\nIn this way to show the organizations tick on their value through spending time and cash invest on the knowledge. The company could use such method to increase the stability of the employees and improve the efficiency. -The consumer’s satisfaction. The excellent external consumer services are based on the internal customer service. If the company could realize that the employees are the key customers for them, then they could get the chance to earn wide profit. As a leader, the company’s attitude towards the employees chiefly determines whether they wish to work for the company.\r\nTo care the employees give the company a chance to provide an excellent consumer services from inside-out. Bass and Avolio (1994) mentioned that the leadership should include behaviors like stir others, intellectual stimulation, coaching and development, respect and faith. This paper thinks, the leadership is, under the organization’s process of implement its target, the ability of the leader influence other related be led and the fundam ental interaction surrounded by leader and the one to be led. The leadership itself is not only a expertness but also a process. In the process, it includes the process of onstruct a binary relationship between the leader and followers, and also includes the functions leader set the organization, improve the efficiency, and leaders help organization adapt the environment, develop and innovative process.? coda To sum up, good management is also an important issue concerning the organizational development. The reason why leadership is more important is that leadership is on a higher level. Take move the horse as example; if the bridegroom has an excellent proficiency to control the horse, perhaps the stableman has management talent.\r\nBut if he always goes to the wrong direction, that is to say, though the high technique of his management, but still cannot achieve the target, then he is doing the incorrect thing. Clawson (2008) said that leadership is nothing if without changes. So under nowadays a fiercely global trend competition and rapid changing of information and technology, leadership becomes more important for the organization. But only integrate the power of these two functions can, the organization develop on the right way.\r\n'