1. How Should Schools Deal With Internet Plagarism. 2. Altering Digital Photographs Art Or Fraud.

ETHICS AND ISSUES2008How should schools deal with Internet plagiarismThere are m some(prenominal) ship slewal as to how a school can deal with net income plagiarism . Firstly , they should teach their students the importance of writing a fair subject field and the worth of hard lap up it has . Students deprivation to know that each typography written by them is their confess accomplished hard work that is entirely original . In such a way , they have learned the innate elements of the work that the school teacher wanted them to work on . In other words , they have succeeded in conflux the requirements of the coursework , no matter what grade they get . Secondly , teachers should super emphasize on the of ethics and ethical writing to the studentsAp cheat from these , a school has to be up-to-date regarding the different ways as to how the students plagiarize . Keeping a track on the one-time(prenominal) s of the previous is one way . The other is to consumption anti-plagiarism software today . The popular software use these days by the universities is Turnitin .com or Mydropbox .com . Students should be taught that plagiarism is a offence and is equivalent to stealingAltering digital photos : Art or FraudSimilar to plagiarizing , falsifying digital photos is artifice and can earn even sanctioned consequences if used for financial or academic gains . Altering digital photos and stating it as your own work is like stealing someone else s work , making some additions and stating it as your own . Just as the painting of Mona Lisa will always be the work of da Vinci Da Vinci , no matter how altered it is , any work done on anybody s presently done work is a crime . In my opinion , altering digital photos can never be an art but a fraud because the original work is done by someone elsePhoto daybookism is in the main subjected to this fraud .

If altering digital photos was to be considered as art , many people would misuse it to present as healthy evidences . Since the natures of digital photos are in a way , alterable , these pieces are never considered as a piece of legal evidence . Software have been developed where any alter in the digital images are spotted and traced that avoids altering of any digital piece as well (Pearson , 2006 . Altering any image or piece for one s own public assistance in to gain money is a crime , then a fraud and not an art . Just as a re-mix music cannot be regarded as an original piece of art , altering digital photos , too cannot be regarded as an artREFERENCESPearson , Helen (2006 . Special Report Forensic Software traces tweaks to images . Nature 439 (520-521 . Retrieved online on the 31st of January 2008 at HYPERLINK http /www .nature .com /nature /journal /v439 /n7076 / well(p) /439520b .html http /www .nature .com /nature /journal /v439 /n7076 /full /439520b .html ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper