The Lark Lane Hypothetical

THE LARK LANE HYPOTHETICALThe the US Constitution states that the right of the community to be secure in their persons , houses , s , and effects , against erroneous essayes and seizures , shall not be violated , and no rationalizes shall issue , nevertheless upon probable cause , back up by oath or affirmation , and particularly describing the level to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized . The right of the people to be secure in their persons , houses , s , and effects , against unreasonable searches and seizures , shall not be violated , and no countenances shall br issue , but upon probable cause , back up by oath or affirmation , and particularly describing the nates to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (Law Cornell , 2008 . The right to be secured has been accept by the fundamental rectitude on the nation . moreover , in many gaucheries ,right to be secured and right to concealment dope be entirely compromised . Any defenses in that locationfrom can be dismissed by the appeal for the suppression of lawless elements 1 . Mike , bloody shame and Molly can question the grimness of the search stock-purchase warrant . A search warrant is an issued by a judge that authorizes guard officers to conduct a search for specific objects or materials at a definite reparation at a specified time (Nolopedia , 2008 . The search warrant was issued only on a telephonic request and the law specifically states that , .no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation , and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized (Nolopedia 2008 . In the stated case , the probable cause was based on the sniffer only and there is no statement that the search warrant was supported by an oath or affirmation by the police officer or by the person who sought for the search warrantMike , bloody shame and Molly can further argue that their right to privacy has been violated .

Under the law , the person to be searched has a right to have a copy of the search warrant and to be informed of the identity of the police officers conducting the search (Findlaw , 2008 . In the present case , the police officers searched the house of Mike , bloody shame and Molly without providing the three with a copy of the search warrant . The proximity and the particularity of the areas to be searched were not known by Mike , Mary and Molly . In addition , the police officers conducting the search warrant did not disclose their identities to Mike Mary and MollyMoreover , Mike , Mary and Molly can suppress the evidences taken from them on the basis that the precursor chemicals and supplies were seized from them unconstitutionally . These evidences taken by unreasonable search cannot be used in court nor can evidence be traced through such abominable means (Findlaw , 2008 . A defendant has a right to contest the legality of a search by raising his constitutional right to privacy and unreasonableness of the search2 . Law officers are charged with the art and responsibility...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper