Child develpoment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Child develpoment - Essay ExampleIn this context, churl ontogenesis is, therefore, not so much about teaching voluminous chunks of fellowship during the formative years or the so-called foundational stage. Rather, fry development is about the methodical approach or the how in which such knowledge is taught to very young children to guide them through their natural and inherent development. This paper discusses four of the primary theories of child development as building blocks of developmentally appropriate knowledge based on the exposition of move (2008) in one of this weeks readings. Biological pus opening This hypothesis was proposed mainly by Gesell during the 1940s to describe a systematic manifestation of the physical and psychological development generally pass judgment among children from the perspective that all children experience the same phases of development grounded on the natural maturation of their brain and body. The opening disregards influences from cult ure or individual differences (Levine and Munsch, 2011). As a child educator / paraprofessional, I do sustain enough utility in this theory because I observed that it places more weight on maturation rather than on learning. This observation was corroborated by Danielson (2007) whose main criticism of the biological maturation theory was that there is too much emphasis on maturation and not enough on learning (para. 41) behavioristic theory The behaviorist theory focuses on what may be directly observed in the absence of a precise method of knowing what happens in an individuals mind. Butts and Rich (2011) outlined that stimulation conditions both in the environment and the persons behavior, as well as responses to such conditions atomic number 18 the only variables which can be observed in any learning situation. Additionally, travel (2008) reported that this theory molds learning with the provision of rewards and penalisation. Unlike the biological maturation theory, there are apparent uses of the behaviorist theory in teaching young children. It may be recalled that behaviorism supports the position what is learned can be unlearned by modifying stimulus conditions in the environment or changing the response to stimuli (Butts & Rich, 2011, p. 206). This area of behaviorism volition be very helpful in teaching young children in breaking tough habits developed during their earlier years. However, I do not believe that banking on behaviorism alone will significantly facilitate the development of appropriate practice in child development. From experience, the behaviorist system of rewards and punishment does not leave any room for abstract thinking since it is categorized under the passive mode. Consequently, crimson if recent development in this area now classifies behaviorism in education as a reactive approach as indicated in Duczeminski (2009), learning still tends to be forced-fed to children rather than the children being precondition leeway to understand knowledge by the explanations they retrieve from their interaction with the environment or from their own observation. My smell is that proactive is best for children in the knowledge society. Cognitive development theory Under this model of child development, learning is centered on perceptions, thinking, reasoning, memory, development changes, and processing of information that transpires within the learner (as cited in Butts & Rich, 2011, p. 213). Swim (2008) describes this learning approach as one in which