Chief Justice Earl Warren Essay

president Dwight Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as the fourteenth political boss Justice of the controlling cost in 1953. Warren had been the governor of calcium twice and was also on the republican ticket for Vice President under Thomas Dewey. It was assumed that Warren would pickup where his successor Fred Vinson leftfield off as a conservative member of the supreme Court, just instead Warren positioned himself as a liberal. When Warren took over as Chief Justice, justices who aligned with discriminatory activism and those who were in favor of judicial controller divided the Supreme Court. One of Warrens goals was to renew the Supreme Courts role in defending individual rights.Warren presided over several(prenominal) civil rights barrier cases including brownness vs. Board of Education I and II, which would take off the great civil rights movement. Warren also presided over cases such as McGowan vs. Maryland and also Tropp vs. Dulles.In Brown vs. the Board of Educatio n, Warren was greatly criticized for not appealing to the precedent (Plessy vs. Ferguson), and rather relying on common ace and fairness. In Chief Justices Warrens dissenting opinion of Brown vs. Board of Education I, he stated Today, education is perhaps the closely important function of state and local governments . To correct them from others of similar date and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their precondition in the community.. .that may affect their hearts and minds in a counseling unlikely to ever be undone. His final statement emphasized that separate but equal facilities are inherently unequal, and also that such a doctrine deprived the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.The unscathed decision uncoiled previous twists of the Constitution that focused solely on the belief that separate but equal facilities did not imply every type of racial inferiority. In 1966 W arren and his court had another study decision to deal with, Miranda v. State of Arizona. The case dealt with criminal suspects and their rights. The courts decision was that criminal suspects had to be informed of theirrights before questioning. Warren and the Supreme Court also rule decisions dealing with legislative apportionment, the basic rights of citizenship, and point of accumulation of the use of libel laws. Again, Warren received both criticism and value as a result of his judicial performances.After such landmark cases, Warrens leadership in these cases became a political unveiling known as The Warren Court, with a heavy idiom on comparison and civil rights. The Warren Court used judicial activism and judicial review to interpret the authority and infallibility of the Supreme Court to resurrect the importance of individual rights. If those individual rights were seen as infringed, the case was likely to be overturned. Warren presided over Brown v. Louisiana 1966, a case where a black student was arrested for protesting a segregated library. Again the Warren Court looked to the 14th Amendments guaranteeing the freedom of speech and assembly, ruling that these rights are not check to verbal expression.In another case the Warren Court ruled on Yates v. coupled States 1956. In this case the court overturned the convictions of commie leaders under the Smith Act. Under the Smith Act whatever person could be arrested and jailed for advocating the violent over throw of the United States government. The Court ruled that the Smith Act violated the defendants First Amendment rights. In short, the Warren court supplemented one of the most notable movements in the muniment of the United States, Warrens emphasis on individual rights and equality were stepping stones for Civil Rights activists, basically giving them protection under the Constitution.