Required Testing for HIV causing AIDS Virus

In addition, there puzzle been many authorities who let argued against the use of compulsory aid exam on the basis that it would be an invasion of privacy, or that it would result in discrimination if the test results were made universal (Seligmann & Hager, 1987, p. 22).

Despite these opinions, studies have shown that the the Statesn public is strongly in support of mandatory testing for the human immunodeficiency virus virus. A modern Gallop Poll showed that a majority of the public favors back up testing for high-risk groups such as homosexuals and intravenous medicine users, stack applying for marriage licenses, people undergoing treatment in infirmarys, and people in certain occupations such as "food handlers, teachers and health-c are workers" (Seligmann & Hager, 1987, p. 22). In addition to the general public, it has recently been found that doctors throughout America are also "joining the political push" for mandatory aid testing (Carey, Quick, & Riley, 1987, p. 57). The federal government has already begun requiring assist testing for all "military recruits, Foreign Service Officers and peacefulness Corps

and Job Corps applicants" (Monmaney & Wingert, 1987, p. 64). In addition, the American government has required that all donated blood be checked for contamination by the human immunodeficiency virus virus (Seligmann & Hager, 1987, p. 22).

Many persons who oppose mandatory AIDS testing have claimed that current methods of testing are barely non accurate enough to be effective. These people worship that AIDS testing

There are many ways in which mandatory testing for the HIV virus would have a beneficial effect for health care workers. For example, mandatory testing of each longanimous incoming a infirmary is important because the virus can be present in the human body without any outer symptoms being seen. This situation creates a serious risk for health care workers, because "if they're treating people who are infected but have non been tested and have no AIDS symptoms, they whitethorn not take the precautions that are vital to their own resort" (Tanne, 1987, p. 45).

This problem is so serious that the American College of Surgeons has recommended that doctors use safety-related gear at all metres during surgery, whether they know if the patient has AIDS or not (Tanne, p. 45).

Carey, J., Quick, B., & Riley, R. (1987, April 20). AIDS: A time of testing. U.S. News and World Report, pp. 56-58.

In summary, mandatory AIDS testing of all patients provides increased effectiveness and safety in the hospital setting. In particular, such testing enables health care workers to hold dear themselves as well as their patients. Mandatory testing for the HIV virus also provides better treatment for patients since it enables physicians to catch the sickness in its early stages. In addition, there is little exigency for patients to worry that their rights of privacy will be taken absent by such testing. This is because all physicians are concerned with care the medical conditions of their patients confidential. Although the results of mandatory AIDS testing in the hospital represent important knowledge for members of the health care staff, it is not necessary for more than a select group of hospital personnel to know the results of such tests.

will possibly stupefy some people "positive" when they actually do not have the disease and other people "negative" when they do (Monmaney & Wingert, 1987, p. 64). However, the current AIDS test is actually quite wide and it is unlikely that su
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!